The Social Side of Decision Making Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

The Social Side of Decision Making - Essay Example Analyzing Bennett's response, the reason why I agreed to his analysis was because I applied my answer based on the events that happened to be the circumstances of the case. Looking at the man's profit as a result of continuous instead of isolated and deterministic events, my line of reasoning would indeed be similar to Bennett's. That the man earned $10 because, after all the transactions he engaged in, he ended up with a profit of $10. However, taking into account Amy's response on the problem, it surfaced that logically, and within the business context, the man ended up earning $20, for the two determined transactions stated in the case. Thus, the difference between Bennett's and Amy's response was the context in which both members analyzed the problem. Bennett considered the man's transactions as a continuous process, hence producing a profit of $10. Amy, on the other hand, applied the case in terms of isolating each transaction conducted by the man, hence coming up with the $20 a nswer. An important principle shown in the activity is the application of the right context in a problem in order to come up with the right or correct answer.

Discussion Board Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

Discussion Board - Essay Example Four issues have arisen regarding the criminal justice system and its relation to individual rights and social control – restorative justice, retributive justice, psychiatric imprisonment and transformative justice. Restorative justice assumes that the victims can be restored to a condition â€Å"just as good as† before the criminal incident and that penalties for wrongs include community service, restitution and other alternatives to imprisonment. Psychiatric imprisonment, on the other hand, treats crime nominally as illness and, therefore, could be treated by psychoanalysis, drugs and other techniques. Transformative justice, meanwhile, does not consider the life of the victim and the offender, nor make any comparison about it before or after the criminal incident. It assumes that all people can be transformed and not to re-offend nor avenge. (Criminal) It is in my opinion that the United States criminal justice process follows the retributive model. That is because our system uses punishment to â€Å"pay back† wrongful deeds. When we say pay back we do not necessarily mean primitive forms of vengeance, but imprisonment, capital punishment and other punishments that the law deemed proportionate to criminal acts done against other human beings and the society as a whole. Our retributive system does not advocate vengeance per se, but justice in response to the wrongs committed against the victims and innocents. (Maiese) There are three important features in the United States criminal justice system. First, the US criminal jurisprudence is designed to protect the rights of the accused. Second, it is an open system where the court responds and reflects to its environment and therefore, is inevitably connected to the political process. And finally the third feature is the interdependency of the agencies within it – the police, courts and correctional departments. Currently, the US criminal justice